David Quammen's The Chimp and the River
Commentary
By
Sampson I.M Onwuka

Commentary
By
Sampson I.M Onwuka

The growing need some of the daring problems of infections leads us back to the new books and new realities, with intent at helping several communities of interest in any field adjust to new ideas about an outbreak and how best to curare such epidemic.
No story is anymore compellingly than the general treatise for HIV, loosely epidermic and to some extent pandemic dealing with the problems of human immune deficiency and gradual if not sudden death of the patient. There is reason why the preventive interest of the vaccination has failed, why there is lack of interest in leading new grounds in medicine and in that direction.
Perhaps it is Obama Care and its audacity or that it came too late to healthcare, or perhaps he is just surviving a tough year with a lot at his table.
No story is anymore compellingly than the general treatise for HIV, loosely epidermic and to some extent pandemic dealing with the problems of human immune deficiency and gradual if not sudden death of the patient. There is reason why the preventive interest of the vaccination has failed, why there is lack of interest in leading new grounds in medicine and in that direction.
Perhaps it is Obama Care and its audacity or that it came too late to healthcare, or perhaps he is just surviving a tough year with a lot at his table.
There is perhaps a better reason such interest lax and why academic interpretation for the basic knowledge on medicine had to be re-interpreted for it seems that Mendel's theory and Charles Darwin's influential thesis on human and biological evolution determined the course of medicine in the last 100 years and has since dogged our approach to vaccination and to virus.
This new book by David Quammen deserves a mention, for its cursory glance invoke similar themes of Spillover by David Quammen to a point that it is not wrong to but I doubt he's position will even change on HIV and its origins, especially the inversion to the Virus' origin as Africa. His case on HIV in his book, Spillover, is biological sensitive information but do not generate enough dogma to illicit public opinion and dissent needed for intellectual trade-tackle.
This new book by David Quammen deserves a mention, for its cursory glance invoke similar themes of Spillover by David Quammen to a point that it is not wrong to but I doubt he's position will even change on HIV and its origins, especially the inversion to the Virus' origin as Africa. His case on HIV in his book, Spillover, is biological sensitive information but do not generate enough dogma to illicit public opinion and dissent needed for intellectual trade-tackle.
One of the better books on the spiral effects of HIV at
virion stage and why neglect is dangerous at any period is a book 'My Own
Country; by Abraham Verghese.He probes into the delicate issue of HIV - especially among
sexual deviant in Tennessee and those who suffer from the problems of neglect in El Paso Texas. Some of
the lasting information on this book is the premier issue of HIV from Primates,
which we discover in David Quammen.
We cannot therefore pretend that the reasons for HIV
profligate is based on anything other human activity, much of it neglect, that
even if this was treated in the new book, it wouldn't matter so much on the
prejudice that the current dogma on HIV is misleading and the reason why the
virus still profligate in spite of the drugs available is lack of due knowledge
on the origins of HIV.
The treatment is different matter but I don't recommend
vaccination.
If HIV originated from other primates and Spillover to
humans - it will not suffice the testicles of men and those of primates. Blood
types are different so also human approach foreign entities.
Yet this is not the case, not nearly the case, that many few
books reviewed, especially a new book on Polio virus and Jonas Salk, but this
is a tackle on the damaging influence of institutional error which has
stagnated the progress of Final Chapters on HIV.
If we borrow from Spillover by the same author David Quammen
who grew up in Chicago, as a measure of 'How AIDS Emerged', we will not fail to
suggest that the issue of Edward Hooper's The River concerning the Cameron
river basin where Chimps and human made contact more than once arise in his
book.
Perhaps David Quammen career may end as started with surveys
on biological life of creatures, with passions for origins and evolutionary
pathways, but if one bound ties to another, he would be a better scientist to
reconsider the nature of HIV as a blood cancer induced by the actions of a
profligate virus, that a lentivirus such as HIV is a slow virus which couldn't
have passed from Chimps to Human. It's science, it takes a while for us to
begin to understand.
Perhaps Quammen and Dr. Susan C. Ball may have considered
these possibilities, but from Quammen and his essays, he was learning too close
to Thomas Curtis and his essays on the work of Hilary Kaprowski.
The enigma behind the Polio virus and monkeys and its
solution is exercised, and perhaps other recent publications on HIV including a
keel from Dr. Beatrice Hahn may add meaning to our understanding. Such dogma as
better explicated by Edward Hooper and The River where he argued on Chimps as
the origin of HIV.
At last perhaps, the disease called HIV would be solved and
the puzzle well known, but this happens - before the final Chapters, there is
need to look at the origination of the Virus and 'HOW AIDS EMERGED' in this
case by David Quammen.
One, cannot resist the temptation of stating that the rest
of the world suggest that more than $100 billion dollars has not being spent on
HIV treatment and discovery - perhaps a larger sum since its beginning, and
perhaps much more will be spent in the market and in this putting an end to the
virus.
What scientist have failed to do is break pattern with his
past, for it seems that Hooper's book in Journalistic and not scientific. But
at the absence of alternative theories, we have not failed to embrace the facts
as accurate.
It is here many of us quarrel over the problems we still
experience with social psychology has a tendency to spoil for a few hundred
thousand when the end is really possible.
I think there is something institutional in the resource allocation
but beyond blame on the origins of the virus and its practical nature is the
reality that the dick-head virus is still elusive and at large.
No comments:
Post a Comment